Arsenal battle Man United for Gnabry

Arsenal’s summer transfer window started with sheer excitement but the wind has rather been taken away from their sails in recent days.

What’s the word?

After welcoming Fabio Vieira to the club from Porto, Edu set his sights on bringing Lisandro Martinez and Raphinha to the Emirates Stadium.

However, it looks as though the latter now prefers a move to Barcelona over the Gunners and Man United have meanwhile joined the race for the former.

Arsenal are set to battle Erik ten Hag’s men for the signature of another exciting talent, though, with reports linking the pair with a move for Serge Gnabry.

The German winger is in the final year of his deal at the Allianz Arena and as a result, is available at a cut-price of £40m.

Arsenal are interested in re-signing Gnabry according to the Daily Star, but they will have to ‘lock horns’ with United in order to sign him.

Better than Raphinha

There was much fanfare behind the Gunners’ bid to sign Raphinha but with that move now seemingly dead in the water, they should turn their attention to Gnabry.

Arsene Wenger holds great regret over the manner in which he left Islington and headed back to his homeland and it’s hardly a surprise when you consider what he’s done since.

A complete machine in the final third, the 26-year-old is now in the prime of his career and has been described as “truly unstoppable” by verified social media manager Alex Chaffer.

It’s easy to see why that assessment has been made with the Germany international scoring 64 goals and supplying 40 assists in 171 outings for Bayern. Five of those goal involvements came in one game back in October 2019, when he truly terrorised Tottenham in the Champions League.

Those types of performances are exactly why Edu and Mikel Arteta should be fighting hard to acquire his signature this summer.

He is a special talent and on the above evidence, he is even better than Raphinha. He has an elite pedigree and has shown on a regular basis that he can light it up on the continent’s biggest stage.

However, a deeper look at his numbers also tells us why he is a greater threat than the Leeds United forward.

Gnabry’s scout report, via FB Ref, is a sea of green with the former West Brom loanee ranking in the top 12% of players in Europe’s top five leagues for shot-creating actions per 90 minutes. Raphinha, by comparison, only sits in the top 32%.

Meanwhile, the effervescent attacker is also in the top 10% for expected assists, the best 6% for progressive carries and the top 5% for touches in the attacking penalty area.

If we compare that to Raphinha, he is considerably better with the Brazilian ranking in the best 34% for expected assists, the top 61% for progressive carries and the top 42% for touches in the opposition’s penalty box.

With that in mind, it’s clear to see why Arsenal should now put all of their eggs in Gnabry’s basket. He is more experienced, knows the Premier League and is available at a bargain price.

Everton eye Spurs midfielder Harry Winks

Everton have reportedly now made contact over the potential signing of Harry Winks.

The Lowdown: Out of favour

The 26-year-old has fallen out of favour under Antonio Conte, having played just 24 times under the Italian over all competitions last season, and only completing the full match in eight of those appearances (Transfermarkt).

With Yves Bissouma signing from Brighton and Hove Albion, the Englishman is likely to fall further down the pecking order, so he could seek a move away this summer.

The Latest: Everton make contact over Winks

As per Football Insider, Everton outfit have now made Winks a ‘top priority’ after officially registering their interest in the player.

A source from the Merseyside club has revealed that they have ‘made contact’ over a potential deal, which would cost them in the region of £20m.

The Verdict: Avoid

Dubbed a ‘fabulous’ player by former Spurs goalkeeper Paul Robinson, Winks has shown his qualities in the past, making his senior England debut in 2017, but he has not played for his country since 2020 (Transfermarkt).

His dip in form has coincided with that of his club, who made the Champions League final three years ago but have only just managed to get back into the competition recently with a fourth-placed finish last season.

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/everton-news-7/” title=”Everton news!” poster=”” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

Astonishingly, Winks has only managed 11 goal contributions in more than 200 games for Tottenham (Transfermarkt), the kind of numbers which would hardly impress Everton manager Frank Lampard.

With the possibility that the Toffees could lose Richarlison and Dominic Calvert-Lewin this summer, the 43-year-old would surely want to sign a midfielder who can contribute more goals and assists than what Winks has done in north London.

In other news, find out which ‘incredible’ ace the Toffees are now most keen to sign

Leeds: Orta interested in Ivanusec

Leeds United are interested in a deal to bring Luka Ivanusec to Elland Road in the summer transfer window.

What’s the talk?

That’s according to a report by Croatian media outlet Germanijak, who claim that Victor Orta has now restarted his pursuit of the GNK Dinamo Zagreb attacking midfielder ahead of Leeds’ 2022/23 campaign.

[snack-amp-story url= “https://www.footballfancast.com/web-stories/read-the-latest-leeds-united-news-transfer-rumours-gossip-and-much-more-2″ title=”Read the latest Leeds news, transfer rumours and more!”]

The report goes on to state that the Whites were believed to have agreed a €15m (£12.5m) deal for in the January window, only for the 23-year-old and his representatives to back out as a result of the Whites’ precarious position in the Premier League table at the time.

Imagine him & Aaronson

With Victor Orta having recently sealed the £25m signing of Red Bull Salzburg starlet Brenden Aaronson, the prospect of the Spaniard adding yet another extremely impressive addition to Jesse Marsch’s attacking options in the shape of Ivanusec is sure to be one that will excite the Elland Road faithful.

Indeed, despite his season being hampered by a groin injury, the £11.25m-rated talent still managed to catch the eye over his 27 1.HNL appearances, scoring three goals, registering five assists and creating four big chances for his teammates, as well as taking an average of 1.9 shots, making 1.4 key passes and completing 1.7 dribbles per game.

These returns saw the £6k-per-week attacker – who can also comfortably operate in central midfield and on either flank – average a SofaScore match rating of 7.09, with the 23-year-old playing a key role in Dinamo’s title-winning campaign.

The player who Sacha Pisani dubbed “exquisite” also impressed in European competition, scoring one goal and providing two assists over seven appearances in Champions League qualification, as well as bagging one goal and one assist over six Europa League outings.

As such, it is clear to see that the signing of Ivanusec – especially for a fee of around £12.5m – would be a fantastic piece of business for Orta to get over the line this summer, with the Croatia international undoubtedly possessing the potential to form a deadly partnership with Aaronson in Marsch’s new-look Leeds midfield.

AND in other news: Orta can unearth next Raphinha as Leeds now eye “spectacular” £12.5m-rated “marvel”

Jack Clarke set for another loan

Sunderland ace Jack Clarke will reportedly sign a new contract with parent club Tottenham Hotspur this summer before heading back out on another loan ahead of the start of next season, according to Lilywhites insider John Wenham.

The Lowdown: An instant impact

The 21-year-old first made the move to the Black Cats on loan from the Premier League outfit back in the January transfer window, where he has made 19 appearances since arriving at the Stadium of Light, scoring one goal and providing three assists during that time, as per Transfermarkt.

The winger played the full two sets of 90 minutes in Sunderland’s League One play-off semi-final against Sheffield Wednesday where they secured a 2-1 aggregate victory, providing the winning assist to Patrick Roberts.

The Latest: Another loan move on the cards

When speaking during an interview about Clarke’s future at Spurs, Wenham admitted that he doubts any club looking to take him on a permanent basis will meet Tottenham’s asking price, making another loan spell the most sensible available option.

He told Football Insider correspondent Ben Wild: “So Clarke is actually out of contract in the summer of 2023.

“So I think what will happen is he will return to us and sign a new one-year extension and he will go out on loan again.

“Maybe this time it will be a Championship club, it would be good to see him move a step higher.

“At this point, no one is going to pay anywhere near what we paid for him so another loan could also boost his value.

“I think that’s the aim at this point. I also don’t think Sunderland will be able to afford him outright but he could rejoin them next season if they go up.”

The Verdict: Make it happen

There’s absolutely no doubt that the Black Cats hierarchy will want to do everything within their power to try and retain the services of the youngster next season and beyond if they are able to afford going back in for another move.

The £25k-per-week starlet has proven to be a real threat in the final third for the Wearsiders this term, where he has averaged 1.6 dribbles, 1.6 key passes, and 1.5 shots per game, via WhoScored, displaying just how much of a huge part he played in getting Alex Neil’s squad into the top-six.

The Scotsman is clearly a huge fan of Clarke too, having dubbed him a “quality” player, and if Sunderland do manage to secure promotion to the Championship, this could be a huge factor when it comes down to the player deciding whether he wants to return to the club again next year.

In other news… a Sky Sports pundit has sent Sunderland a warning ahead of their upcoming play-off final.

England's rigid front-runners suffer another untimely brain-freeze

Eoin Morgan’s men have been World Cup front-runners for two years now. But their lack of adaptability on sporty pitches is a concern

George Dobell in St Lucia03-Mar-2019Just ahead of this ODI series, Eoin Morgan called on his England side to show an ability to adapt to conditions. At the time he made the comment, he foresaw a series played on slow, turning surfaces which could test England’s aggressive approach to batting. As it was, most of the series was played on very good batting tracks, with the final match played on a surface offering pretty steep bounce by modern standards.But the principle was the same: Morgan was calling on his side to show an ability to adapt and they failed to do so. While it would be simplistic to dismiss this England team as flat-track bullies, it wouldn’t be totally untrue, either. On flat wickets where the ball neither seams, spins or bounces especially high, England are world beaters.On other surfaces? Well, they were knocked out of the Champions Trophy by Pakistan on a pitch offering help to spin and reverse swing. They were bowled out for 153 by South Africa on a green surface at Lord’s (they were 20 for 6 at one stage) and 196 by Australia on a seaming surface in Adelaide (they had been 8 for 5 at one stage). If they come up against such a surface in a knock-out game at the World Cup – and they did in both the 2013 Champions Trophy final and the 2017 Champions Trophy semi-final – they look vulnerable.”We didn’t adapt,” Morgan admitted afterwards. “It was a terrible batting performance which is a disappointing way to end the series. We need to learn from the experience.”The time for learning is up, though. Well, just about, anyway. England will have named their provisional World Cup squad before they play another ODI and they are committed to the batting line-up that played in this series.They are, in many ways, an admirable bunch. They have improved vastly and expanded the bounds of what we thought possible in this format. On the sort of surfaces which are expected during the World Cup – true, flat and even-paced – they will worry any bowling attack in the world. They have, after all, thrashed the two highest scores in ODI history in the last three years and have four of the five highest totals made in the format since the last World Cup.And perhaps it is inevitable, if you progress at such pace so often, that you will occasionally fall. For, in the 39 completed first innings England have had in ODI cricket since the last World Cup, they have passed 400 four times and won on each occasion. They have passed 300 on 24 occasions and won 19 of those games. And, yes, on four occasions, they have failed to reach 200 and have been beaten on each occasion. If we praise them for their boldness on the days the shots end up in the stands, we have to be very careful about criticising when those same shots end up in hands. This was a drawn series, after all; not a defeat. They have still not lost a bilateral ODI series (so excluding the one-off game against Scotland) since they were in India in early 2017. That’s 10 series with nine victories.Losing the toss was significant here, too. Perhaps due to heavy rain overnight, the pitch started just a little tacky. With England reasoning it would ease during the day, they felt the need to attack in order to set a winning total. This is not a team that tries to limit the extent of their loss; it’s a team that tried to win. Always.Morgan, to his credit, refused to use the toss as an excuse. Reasoning that winning the toss is always, to a greater or lesser extent, an advantage, he knows that England cannot expect to have things – the pitch, the toss, the conditions – their own way all the way through a World Cup campaign.Shimron Hetmyer and Darren Bravo celebrate winning the match•Getty Images”The toss is an advantage across every game we play,” Morgan said. “I might have argued that if we’d lost by one or two wickets, but we weren’t at the races today.”One of the frustrations with this England side is that it seems, with just a little better judgment, with just a little more nous, they could improve markedly. As Morgan admitted, it was clear from the first few minutes that this pitch offered the bowlers some life and clear that England would have to bat accordingly. For reasons that are not clear, they were unable to do so.”It was evident from the first two overs [that we had to adapt],” Morgan said. “You could see it from the changing room. We did have that conversation. But we didn’t adapt. Trying to curb your natural ability, to try to go from high-risk to low-risk and still get a score in the morning that will be good enough in the afternoon, is difficult.”Whose job should that be to gauge what a winning total is on each pitch? Well, this team has been together for a long time now. Every option for the opening position has played more than 60 ODIs and should be able to show the sophistication to know when to take the foot off the accelerator. Joe Root, too, is an experienced player who has scored more ODI centuries for England than anyone else. He should be able to adapt his game as required. Morgan, with more than 200 caps to his name, should also be able to do so.Morgan disputes the suggestion that England are slow learners, however. While he accepts there is a general problem in adapting to new conditions, he felt England have shown improvement on slow, low surfaces and simply haven’t experienced a pitch with as much bounce in it as this.”When we come up in conditions for the first time it has gone wrong,” Morgan said. “When we’ve come back in conditions that are similar to where we’ve made mistakes, we’ve actually played really well. It’s easy to gloss over things like that because when we play well some of our guys make things look quite easy.”We learned from that Champions Trophy defeat. We went away from home and played on slow, low wickets and improved our game from that experience.”These was a surface that we rarely come up against. It was just the bounce. And I don’t think we dealt and adapted with that. We continued to play as if we were on the same pitch in Grenada. A low-risk shot there was high-risk today.”There are other areas of concern. And the England bowlers’ failure to learn to deal with Chris Gayle throughout the series – if anything, he became more destructive as the series progressed – is one of them.Gayle is an exceptional player, of course. But England will come up against several exceptional players during the World Cup and, if their batsmen get the run-filled pitches they want, their bowlers will have nowhere to hide. They have to find a way to at least stem the bleeding. Gayle hit a six every 8.10 balls he faced this series. It’s hard to imagine a World Cup-winning bowling attack allowing that.Where could they have bowled to him? Well, the Hawkeye pitch map for this innings suggests England attempted to bowl three yorkers at him. The two aimed at the stumps were dot balls, while the one aimed down the leg-side, as Gayle attempted to give himself room, was inside-edged to the boundary. They bowled five yorkers at him during his innings of 162 in Grenada, too. None of them went to the boundary and four of them were dot balls. And they didn’t bowl any yorkers on the line of the stumps at him during his innings of 135 in the first ODI. It seems odd that it was not a line of attack pursued more often.”Gayle is probably in the best form of his life,” Morgan argued by way of mitigation. “Our execution needs to be near on perfect and that’s a really good test because we are going to come up against similar players in the World Cup.”So, here they are, on the brink of the World Cup and with lessons to learn with bat and ball. They’ve been the front-runners for this tournament for a couple of years now. But as we get closer to the event, it feels as if the field is starting to close.

Paint my love

Sudhir Gautam, uber Tendulkar fan, is now rooting for a new sport

Susan Ninan16-Mar-2017Bathed in canary yellow, Sudhir Kumar Chaudhry, better known as Sudhir Gautam, leans forward, his kohl-lined eyes glued to the badminton match on the court below. A giant yellow flag rests beside him. As a smash lands wide, Sudhir jumps up. Grabbing his flag, he waves it fervently from side to side, blowing his conch shell. Spectators seated behind grimace, even attempt a meek protest. But Sudhir isn’t listening. After all, he’s only doing his job.For easily the most recognisable sports fan in the country, associated with its most venerated sportsman – Sachin Tendulkar – this is fresh turf. A familiar presence in the stands at every cricket match featuring the Indian team for over a decade and half now, home or away, Sudhir found himself, at the start of the year, in freezing indoor stadiums for the first time. A new sport and team have been added to his itinerary. Tendulkar has willed it so.In December last year, Tendulkar bought stakes in the Bengaluru Blasters franchise of the Premier Badminton League (PBL). During the first day of India’s Test against England in Mumbai that month, Sudhir was summoned to Bengaluru for a PBL commercial. It was the first time he had missed a day’s play in cricket in 16 years.And so, with a formidable record under his belt – as of early January, when ESPN spoke to him, he had watched 278 ODIs, 49 T20Is and 58 Tests, numbers similar to the playing CV of cricketer Yuvraj Singh – Sudhir made his “debut” in another sport, although Tendulkar remains the connection.”I’m supporting Sachin sir’s team [Bengaluru Blasters] though he is not in the stadium. I have ‘Tendulkar 10’ written on my back, though this is not Team India. I’m very happy that Sachin sir is encouraging sports other than cricket.”I have not asked him for anything till date, but whenever there’s a match outside India, I request him for a pass. He’s never said no. Somehow he arranges everything. He’s my God,” Sudhir says.His bare upper body painted to resemble a human form of the national tricolour, Sudhir was accorded special status by Tendulkar and offered passes for all India matches, no matter in which part of the world they were being played, and turned into a willing unofficial mascot.

“I said I wanted to continue to cheer for the team and carry his name on my body till I die”Sudhir Gautam about Tendulkar, after the 2011 World Cup

“When I first went to the stadium with ‘Tendulkar 10’ written on my back, he liked it. When Sachin sir asked me if I would like to watch more matches, I did not for once think about the graduation exam form that I had filled out. He asked me to appear for my exams first. I was adamant, though. I never expected that I’d watch all those matches.”

****

Growing up, the closest Sudhir could get to his idol was a peeling poster in his tiny, dilapidated settlement in Muzaffarpur, Bihar. Attempting the Tendulkar upper cut and straight drive, he would often end up being dismissed cheaply in college cricket matches. In 2002 he was picked for a state cricket tournament from his college. Around the same time a local journalist, aware of Sudhir’s fandom, suggested he cycle down to watch the India-West Indies one-day series. Sudhir agreed. The first ODI was to take place in Jamshedpur, 519km away from his home town. As luck would have it, when Sudhir got there for the match, he heard Tendulkar had suffered a hamstring injury and was ruled out of the series. “I was very disappointed,” he says, “That’s when I decided that in 2003 I will travel to Mumbai on my cycle again.”The following year, Sudhir, then 22, cycled for 16 days, from Muzaffarpur to Mumbai, roughly 2000km away, where he finally caught a glimpse of his idol outside a five-star hotel in the south of the city. He threw his cycle to the ground to distract the security personnel before jostling past gathered fans to touch Tendulkar’s feet. His life was never the same again.Not only was Sudhir invited home by Tendulkar and offered a match pass, but just when he was about to return to Muzaffarpur, content with his accomplishments, things took a different turn. After India lost the Wankhede ODI to Australia, Sudhir paid Tendulkar one last visit before heading home. “? [Would you like to watch more matches, Sudhir?],” Tendulkar politely inquired.Skipping his graduation exams, spurning any prospect of a full-time job and distancing himself from his family, Sudhir chose a life single-mindedly dedicated to cheering for Tendulkar and the Indian team across the world. Nearly 14 years later, he has no regrets. “I’ve left three jobs and haven’t completed my graduation till date. But I’m happy.”Gautam with Tendulkar and the 2011 World Cup trophy•Getty ImagesHis first job was that of a railway ticket collector in Hyderabad, following which he took up work at a dairy in Muzaffarpur. He left that job to travel abroad for an India match, digging into his last reserves – his provident fund – to acquire a passport.His travels have taken him across the country and the world, whether by cycle to Pakistan, or as far away as Australia and New Zealand for the 2015 World Cup. “I have friends everywhere, Dubai, Bangladesh or Australia, with whom I stay with during matches. In Pakistan, for instance, I know I’m always welcome at [the famous Pakistani cricket mascot] Cricket Chacha’s house.”Tendulkar not only offered Sudhir passes for the 2015 World Cup but also ensured that he had a comfortable stay. “Since it was my first time in Australia, Sachin sir booked a hotel room for me. If I happen to travel there again, I won’t need to stay in a hotel, because there are Indians everywhere and everyone likes Sachin sir, so I can stay with them,” he says.The high point came in 2011, when India’s won the 50-over World Cup on home soil. After the final, played in Mumbai, Tendulkar, who was making his last appearance in the tournament, asked Sudhir to join the team in the dressing room and then handed him the trophy. “That was an unforgettable moment for me.”Soon after the match, Sudhir poured his heart out to Tendulkar, telling him about the apprehensions he had about his future following his hero’s impending retirement. “I said I wanted to continue to cheer for the team and carry his name on my body till I die.” Tendulkar assured him of his support.When Tendulkar retired in November 2013, that foreboding was brought home by a billboard for a job-search website. Alongside Sudhir’s painted face, the words screamed: “Looking for a new job?” It was an inescapable truth.Today, Sudhir says, people often try to coax him to wear the name of a current playing member of the Indian cricket team, the popular opinion favouring Virat Kohli, over that of Tendulkar, on his body. He shuts them up with little trouble, he says. Last year, when invited to cheer for Virender Sehwag’s side, Gemini Arabians, at the Masters Champions League (MCL) in Dubai, it was suggested that he drop Tendulkar’s name and paint “MCL” in its place. “I asked them to book my return tickets instead,” Sudhir says. Realising that he wouldn’t budge, the team organisers abandoned their request and asked him to stay on.Back in the badminton arena, eyes cast earthwards, Sudhir patiently waits for the questions, hands resting on his knees. A gaggle of curious onlookers quickly gathers around us, mostly selfie-hunters. He obliges them with practised ease. He’s wiry and strikingly bald, save for a pigtail and a small patch of hair in the centre of his head that is trimmed to resemble the physical contours of the map of India and painted in the colours of the national flag. The insignia of the Bengaluru badminton franchise is painted across his chest in red and he sports his idol’s name on his back in sweeping, bold letters, along with the sacred jersey number: 10. Before this, Sudhir had never watched a badminton match.It took him a while to understand the game (which, in this tournament, is played with tweaked rules). “At first I just couldn’t understand what was happening,” he says. “I had no idea how the points system worked. I asked people why they were clapping. But after watching a few matches in Hyderabad, I started to get a clearer idea. Now I’ve begun liking it.”The water colours he uses to paint himself from head to waist for PBL matches can be applied and removed more quickly than the enamel paint he favours for cricket matches, because of its ability to weather longer hours and outdoor conditions. “I’ve been painting myself for 16 years now. Not once have I suffered from any skin infections or allergies,” he says, before explaining why he took to painting his body. “I wanted Sachin sir to notice me. I thought to myself, much like some people paint their cheeks in the colours of the national flag during a match to show support, why don’t I take it a step forward and paint my entire upper body?”

“He’s one of the most visible brands for sport in the country. People know him exclusively as a Tendulkar fan, so that creates a direct connection between him and the spectators”Prasad Mangipudi, executive director of Sportzlive

For his face, Sudhir usually uses water colours – 15ml bottles of orange, white and green, each of which lasts for close to eight matches. As he runs us through his regime with feverish detail, it’s difficult not to wonder what he looks like sans his second skin.”People, I think, know what I look like now unpainted,” he says alluding to his popularity, “My hair and look are distinct.” Enamel paint for his body, which he usually procures in half-litre batches for each series, takes close to six hours to apply, which often means having to give up sleep at night. “Lying down would mess up the paint. Whether I’m staying at a friend’s place or in a hotel room, I sit through the night after my body is painted before a match.”Sudhir is a compelling figure in the Indian sporting landscape, says Prasad Mangipudi, executive director of Sportzlive, which owns the rights to the PBL. “He’s one of the most visible brands for sport in the country. His distinct appearance makes for instant recall. People know him exclusively as a Tendulkar fan, so that creates a direct connection between him and the spectators. In the PBL matches that Tendulkar is not able to attend, it’s almost like Sudhir is cheering on his behalf. He waves the flag, the crowd too joins in and cheers, which in turn spurs players, so if you look at it he can bring about a change in the stadium atmosphere by his presence.”The idea behind the PBL commercial – which shows Sudhir painting himself ahead of a match and Tendulkar referring to him as his “greatest fan” – was to create a flutter and make it memorable, Mangipudi says. Sudhir’s presence in the stands has also set the organisers thinking about ways of enhancing the fan experience for future editions.”We are mulling the prospect of having a fan icon for each team,” Mangipudi says, “The idea is to engage fans to a greater extent, and we are looking into the possibility of running a contest to pick a fan who could maybe sit in the dugout with team members.”Sudhir is mindful of the identity he has carved for himself among sport fans in the country. Heartbroken after Tendulkar’s retirement and probably unwilling to be weighed down by the baggage of memories, he gave up riding his cycle to matches.Little else lights him up like seeing packed stands with cheering crowds. “I want more fans to show up. Today I’m there, but tomorrow I may not be around.”One of the few occasions when he looks up to make eye contact is when the topic of family is broached. “I don’t answer calls from my family.” He last paid a visit home after the Chennai Test in December 2016. “In case of an emergency, if someone in the family dies, I would have to leave a match and go, which I cannot. They know how involved I’m with the game.”Sudhir will turn 36 this year. Seemingly expecting the query, he dismisses the idea of marriage. “I have never thought about it and never will. As long as I’m breathing, I’ll support team India. Marriage will only distract me. That’s unacceptable.”

Japan heroics show what cricket will miss

Japan’s stunning victory over South Africa at the rugby World Cup is a timely reminder of everything that cricket’s introspective rulers are turning their backs on

Tim Wigmore24-Sep-2015To see Japanese and locals united in delirium on Brighton Pier last week as they celebrated Japan’s victory over South Africa in the rugby World Cup was to be reminded of the best of sport. As 30,000 spectators cheered Japan on to defeating the Springboks, it provided a glorious start to the eighth World Cup in the sport.To cricket fans the spectacle was simultaneously intoxicating and deeply grating. For as thrilling as Japan’s victory was, it was a reminder of what is being lost from the cricket World Cup, when the next two events contract to ten teams.To English cricket fans the contrast is particularly salient. Led by Giles Clarke, the ECB has been vehemently opposed to the notion of more than ten teams appearing in the World Cup, even arguing against a pre-qualifier, akin to the first stage of the World T20, being held in England just before the main event. Japan provided one of the most engrossing sights in all sport in 2015, but a side with their world ranking of 13th has scant chance of making cricket’s showpiece events in 2019 and 2023.Three months ago the ICC declared its ambition to establish cricket as the “world’s favourite sport” by 2023 – admirable words, certainly, but hard to reconcile with the current will of those running the sport. Indeed, the pulsating early days of the rugby World Cup have shown that perhaps cricket should be anxious about holding onto second place.Participation numbers for cricket received a huge boost in Ireland after the 2007 World Cup•Getty ImagesUntil 2015 Japan’s World Cup history – played 24 but won only one, with a net points difference of minus 731 – made for sobering reading. In the pantheon of cricket Associates they were more Bermuda than Ireland.It would have been easy to give up on Japan. Instead World Rugby redoubled its efforts, sending coaches and expertise to Japan, creating the Pacific Nations Cup in 2006 to give meaningful competition in the region and even awarding the 2019 World Cup to the country. The upshot, as coach Eddie Jones said after the toppling of the Springboks, is that the best young Japanese athletes will now be more inclined to choose rugby over competing sports.An inclusive attitude to the World Cup is at the core of World Rugby’s strategy for expanding the sport. Participation in the World Cup not only spurs children to take up the game – in Uruguay 25,000 more children are playing than a year ago after they qualified for the World Cup – but also allows emerging nations to cultivate financial support.Indeed, part of the rationale for a 20-team World Cup is to help developing countries become less dependent upon the largesse of World Rugby. Canada and the United States are prime examples: in the last decade, the proportion of their revenue that comes from World Rugby, rather than outside sources, has fallen from almost half to 10%. “Being in the World Cup is a huge boost to those countries being able to bring in a range of sponsors,” says Morgan Buckley, General Manager Development for World Rugby.The ECB is being short-sighted by not allowing some 2019 World Cup matches to be hosted in venues like Edinburgh•Getty ImagesWorld Rugby views the return of rugby to the Olympic Games, after 92 years, as the next stage in its development. “If you’re an Olympic sport it opens the doors into ministries of education and rugby can be on the curriculum,” explains Buckley. “When rugby is shown on every TV screen next year people will really see rugby in a new light.” Olympic status will be a particular boon for women’s rugby.Already the impact of rugby’s vision is becoming apparent: the total number of players beyond the ten Tier One nations more than doubled, from 1.45 million to 3.25 million, between 2012 and 2015. This is globalisation at high speed. And it has come not in spite of rugby’s traditional powers but largely because of them. As in cricket, elite rugby nations are not immune to self-interest. But unlike in cricket, they have the foresight to recognise that spreading the game provides the best guarantee of their wealth in the long-term, as Buckley says. “They realise that having a global World Cup, with the TV deals that are done in Asia and throughout the globe, benefits everybody.”Many at the ICC share World Rugby’s expansionary zeal. Some of the results here are startling, too: the number of cricketers beyond the Test world rose from 500,000 to 1.4 million between 2010 and 2015. But, for all the brilliant work of the ICC’s Global Development Programme, it is the pull of playing in the World Cup that has underpinned the self-betterment of many of those beyond the Test elite. After their dramatic entrance onto the world stage in 2007, Ireland rapidly attained heights unimagined in the 275 years in which cricket had been played in the country: participation numbers have quadrupled since, and the Irish government, on both sides of the border, has been suitably impressed. Unyielding determination to get onto the world stage, and show the globe a different side of the country, has inspired Afghanistan’s journey.All Blacks players play rugby with Japanese schoolkids in Tokyo, 2013•AFPThe Associate world is no longer just about these two nations: two other Associates, the Netherlands and Hong Kong, toppled Full Members at last year’s World T20. This success represents vindication for the vision of the late Jagmohan Dalmiya in creating the Champions Trophy in 1998 as a tool to bankroll funds for non-Test-playing countries.Yet cricket now seems content to put up the white flag on its global ambitions. It is not only the cricket fraternity who notice the ICC’s myopia in contracting the World Cup, disingenuously presenting the World T20 as a 16-team event rather than a ten-team tournament with a qualifier tacked on, and shunning the Olympics. Governments have paid heed too. While rugby has benefited from sizeable investment from governments, including in China and the US, after joining the Olympics, cricket’s rejection of the Games makes funding cricket altogether less appealing. The Irish Sports Council have let it be known that it would be highly likely to increase funding for cricket if it became an Olympic Sport. As Ireland attempts to get financial support from the government to build permanent stands at grounds, it will not pass unnoticed either that while the ECB allowed Ireland, the Netherlands and Scotland to host matches in the 1999 World Cup, it has made it clear it will not do so again in 2019.For cricket, the fear is short-term greed will have a deleterious long-term impact. As football continues to expand, rugby and cricket compete for attention underneath. It should be an unfair battle. The ICC has the capacity to do far more than World Rugby to grow the sport: between 2007 and 2015 the ICC generated profits of $900 million, around $500 million more than World Rugby; the ICC expects to double its figure between 2015 and 2023.Rugby in Rio: a sport’s presence in the Olympics has a knock-on effect in participation, government funding and sponsorship•Getty ImagesYet by diverting more revenue to Australia, England and India than the other 103 ICC members combined, cricket risks “losing the inherent trust of the public,” believes the sports ethics campaigner Jaimie Fuller. “If the consequences of this are that they lose their very valuable place in the pantheon of sports rankings then they will deserve all they get.”In March Andy Balbirnie scored 97 in Ireland’s thrilling victory over Zimbabwe in the World Cup. He has watched World Rugby’s inclusive attitude jealously.”These Japanese players are heroes and that is what this rugby World Cup is doing – creating heroes. The ICC has such an opportunity to do the same,” he says. “For Associate players to become heroes they need to show off their skills on the biggest stage, which is a World Cup. Cricket will miss out on the underdog story that we all love no matter what the sport.”As rugby eyes establishing its World Cup among the top three sports events in the world – behind only the football World Cup and Olympics – cricket should be wary. The myopia, greed and short-termism of cricket’s ruling elite, led by the guilty men running the game in Australia, England and India, risks grave consequences for the sport’s well-being. It might not only be rugby that leaves cricket behind.

Form, record and playing conditions favour India

India have done well against South Africa in T20Is and might improve their record further given their form and the favourable conditions at Mirpur

Shiva Jayaraman03-Apr-2014The two teams have progressed to the semi-finals in contrasting fashion. India have waltzed in there after winning all their matches comfortably. They are the only unbeaten team in the league stages. Their narrowest win came against West Indies – by seven wickets with two balls to spare. Even in that game India had progressed to a stage when they needed just 23 runs from 32 balls with eight wickets in hand.South Africa have had to sweat it out. After ending up with a defeat from a winning position against Sri Lanka – they fell short by five runs chasing 165, after having scored 110 for 3 at the end of the 14th over – South Africa had to work hard for their wins in the remaining games. They snatched a win from New Zealand in the last over: Dale Steyn managed to defend what were the lowest runs to have been defended in T20Is in the last over – seven. This had only been done twice before – South Africa themselves had done it against the same opposition at Eden Park in 2012 and two days later Ireland did this in a match against Kenya. Ireland contrived to lose from a winning position against them. Their win against England, though hard earned, wasn’t as hard as the three-run margin suggests.India’s bowlers did a fine job of restricting the opposition in the league matches: the highest total that was scored against them in these three matches was 138, by Bangladesh. India batted second in three of their four games and the targets have obviously not tested their batsmen – evident from the fact that they have one of the lowest strike rates in the tournament and have lost the fewest wickets. India’s batsmen (click here for their tournament stats) have averaged 35.4 and scored five fifty-plus scores – both the highest among teams in the league stage. South Africa’s batsmen (click here for their tournament stats) have scored the most runs by any team in the main league stage and have the best strike rate as well. They have scored heavily in the last-five overs: their scoring rate of 10.6 being second only to West Indies’ 11.3.

Batting stats – Teams in the league stage

TeamMatRunsHSAveSRDis100/50sSouth Africa464586*23.03134.1280/3England4610116*22.59131.5271/1West Indies45937224.70123.5240/2Australia45657418.22126.7310/3Pakistan4556111*20.59118.6271/1India453162*35.40114.7150/5Bangladesh44976617.13104.2290/1Sri Lanka44868922.09124.6220/3New Zealand44196519.04116.7220/3Netherlands44156314.3199.8290/1

South Africa’s bowlers – much like their batsmen – have had to work hard. With South Africa bowling second in three of their matches, their bowlers have got the worse of the conditions under the lights at Chittagong, which has been the more difficult venue for bowlers with dew being a factor on occasions. Despite this, their bowlers have managed 30 wickets in the league stage – the second highest by any team in the tournament. They have also leaked runs though: their economy of 8.26 is one of the worst among teams. South Africa’s area of concern has been their bowling in the Powerplay overs – they have taken only four wickets in these overs and have conceded runs at 8.91 runs an over. Their economy in these overs in the worst among the ten teams in the league stage and a run and a fraction more than the next worst.India’s bowling in this tournament, helped by the spin-friendly conditions at Mirpur, has come up trumps. Their economy of 6.17 in this World T20 has been the best among teams. While their spinners have lead from the front, their medium pacer Bhuvneshwar Kumar has bowled extremely well too. He has played an important role in restricting the opposition batsmen. His economy of 4.33 in this tournament is the best among bowlers who have bowled at least five overs. India have been the best bowling unit in the Powerplays too, with an economy of 4.5 in these overs. Bhuvneshwar has bowled ten overs in the Powerplays conceding just 34 runs – among bowlers who have bowled a minimum of five overs in the Powerplays, no bowler has done better.

Bowling economy – Overall and Powerplays

TeamTotal WktsPowerplay WktsEcoPowerplay EcoAveSR4/5wIndia
27
6
6.17
4.5017.44
16.9
1/0
West Indies
31
11
6.32
5.4115.64
14.8
1/0
Sri Lanka
26
10
6.73
4.6616.92
15.0
1/1
Netherlands
25
7
6.81
6.5419.10
16.8
0/1
New Zealand
26
7
7.48
6.5422.84
18.3
0/0
Pakistan
23
6
7.66
7.0026.17
20.4
0/0
Australia
20
6
8.22
6.8332.75
23.9
0/0
South Africa
30
4
8.26
8.9121.66
15.7
2/0
England
14
3
8.41
7.8839.28
28.0
0/0
Bangladesh
16
2
8.46
7.2040.18
28.5
0/0

Chittagong has been the venue where spinners – Sri Lanka’s on both occasions – have completely annihilated their opposition in a couple of games. However, given the slow and dry conditions at Mirpur, spinners have been trusted to bowl more here compared with Chittagong. In ten league matches at Mirpur, spinners have bowled 205 overs -an average of 10.2 overs per innings – to 95 overs at Chittagong.

Spinners at Mirpur and Chittagong

VenueMatOversWktsEcoAveSRBBI4/5wMirpur
10
205
63
6.78
22.06
19.5
4/112/0
Chittagong
1095
32
7.40
21.96
17.8
5/31/1
India and South Africa are playing each other in the knockout stages of a major (involving five or more teams) limited-overs tournament after more than ten years. The last time these two teams played each other in such a game was in the semi-finals of the Champions Trophy in 2002. There have been three such encounters between the teams with India coming out on top on all occasions. In T20Is though, this will be their first match in the knockout stage. Both the teams have made it to the semi-finals of the World T20s once before. While India went on to win the tournament in 2007, South Africa lost to the eventual champions, Pakistan, in 2009. Overall in T20Is, India have played South Africa in seven T20Is and have won five of them – the most they have against any team.

Head-to-head – South Africa’s record v India

FormatMatWonLostT20Is
7
2
5
World T20413World T20 knock-outs—ODIs (Major tournaments) knock-outs303

Ding gong!

From Paddy Briggs, United Kingdom One of the Australian team’s sledges during England’s woeful last tour of Australia was the one directed at Paul Collingwood who had been awarded the honour of becoming a Member of the ‘Most Excellent Order of

Cricinfo25-Feb-2013Paddy Briggs, United Kingdom
One of the Australian team’s sledges during England’s woeful last tour of Australia was the one directed at Paul Collingwood who had been awarded the honour of becoming a Member of the ‘Most Excellent Order of the British Empire’ (MBE) for his innings of 7 and 10 and his 0-17 in the 2005 Oval Test match. Lovely chap Colly but, as the Aussies suggested, was this performance really worthy of a gong?This brings me to the subject of honours and cricket and an invitation to you to join in a discussion of the most surprising omissions from the cricketing gong list.Let’s start with a trio of England captains, Wally Hammond, Ted Dexter and Tony Greig. When I was a kid Dexter was referred to as ‘Lord Ted’ but I was disappointed to learn that (like Geoffrey Boycott’s knighthood) this was an honorary title. Boycs has an OBE but Ted remains not even a Member of the British Empire, let alone anything more distinguished. Greigy’s involvement with Packer perhaps scuppered his chances and Hammond did have some dodgy business dealings but their cricketing achievements are surely not in dispute?There are a fair number of batsmen in the gongless list who would be close to the top of a cricket fan’s list of England batting greats. Herbert Sutcliffe, Frank Woolley and Ken Barrington to name but three, and Allan Lamb and Robin Smith wouldn’t be far behind. Add all-rounder Wilfred Rhodes and you have the core of a pretty good side. Then the fast bowling would be lead by John Snow aided by Andy Caddick, Devon Malcolm, Graham Dilley and spinners Laker, Lock and Verity would be in the frame ‘how can they all never have been honoured?’But for me the biggest omission of all on the list of cricketers unhonoured in my lifetime is the man I regard as England’s greatest ever wicket-keeper Alan Knott. Now it may be that the shy and elusive Knotty turned down an honour – but if not it’s not too late is it? But what do you think, are there even more deserving cases than his?

The gold standard

Chappell had talent, elegance and technique to burn, but more formidable was the discipline he imposed on himself – one more severe than those of any of his contemporaries

Gideon Haigh28-Nov-2010Australian cricket doesn’t have much time for elegance. It looks unserious, brittle, even a little effete. Australians favour aggression – bustling, bristling, business-like. They like to think of themselves as all about effect and output; it’s not how but how many. For Greg Chappell, they made an exception.The elegance did not, of course, come first. For more than a decade Chappell was the gold standard of Australian batting. He was like bullion in the vaults: the reserve currency. In the speculative side you chose at the pub, you put down his name at No. 4, and then you started with the rest. I dare say Australia’s selectors were the same. So Chappell did what was in him, and it to be beautiful.Yet it did matter how he achieved this, by looking a treat. After an early tightening of his technique, there was no stage in Chappell’s career when he was not a dazzling strokemaker. Nobody ever enjoined him to “bat ugly”; it would hardly have been possible. He had a bearing, a majesty, even in repose. He might have played three maidens, but if one dropped into the slot you knew it would be on-driven for four; he might take three hours over the first fifty, but the second fifty would take 45 minutes with barely a hint of extra effort.Chappell was a tall, slim, lean man – even a little austere. He played his cover drive from full height. The bat came down straight. The weight surged through the ball. It looked imperious. It imperious. As a spectator, you felt the wash of disdain – how it must have felt to bowlers. As for the leg side, you sensed he could have nominated any of its 180 degrees and hit it there, particularly behind square, the quadrant into which he directed his signature, wristy, upright flick. He never hurried, never seemed to push too hard, never thrashed or slogged when a stroke would do – he just made up his own rules and followed them, without deviation.Between balls and times, Chappell looked a little uptight, his pipe-cleaner man’s physique emphasised by a shirt buttoned to the neck, sleeves always to the wrist. His stance was stiff-legged, over-topped by a stoop. The bat made a rhythmic tap, before one final, faintly voluptuous loop towards gully. Then, with the ball in flight, everything changed. The bat and body snapped into line. The hands aligned perfectly at slip. Chappell didn’t take spectacular catches, fumbles or rebounds – his anticipation was too good to need to. The ball simply vanished and never reappeared.The effect was strangely humbling. When Chappell reached 200 at the Gabba in December 1981, a spectator bounced off the old Hill there and began hare-ing for the centre, pursued at the plod by security – a year before the misfortune of Terry Alderman, such invaders were an annoyance rather than a threat. It wasn’t to slap Chappell on the back or obtain his autograph that this man came either: he took the batsman’s gloved hand, went down on one knee and bowed his head, as if genuflecting to royalty. Watching Chappell put John Arlott in mind of William Clarke’s description of Joe Guy: “All ease and elegance, fit to play before the Queen in Her Majesty’s parlour.” It was something to provoke similar spontaneous homage from the Aussie egalitariat.It was not all patrician airs and drawing-room decorum, of course. Most people know that Chappell scored a century in his first Test. Not everyone remembers that he did so batting at No. 7, bowling his medium pace as the first-change bowler. He was joining a rather embattled team, recently mauled in South Africa and about to lose the Ashes too. Nor did he immediately impress as a permanent fixture. A couple of months before the Australian team to tour England in 1972 was chosen, his place was uncertain.Chappell’s batting crystallised when abundant natural talent was harnessed by an anchorite’s self-control. Early in his career he played his shots with a generous abandon. His biographer Adrian McGregor explains that the admonitions of Chappell’s father, and of the respected Adelaide journalist Keith Butler, caused him to undergo some soul-searching. Nine times out of 10, Chappell reasoned, a batsman blew himself up. He must not indulge bowlers so. He sacrificed none of his strokes – Richie Benaud had enjoined him not to. He simply developed a mental self-discipline more severe than any contemporary’s. His was the first generation to take the mental side of cricket in earnest, reading Rudi Webster’s , visiting the hypnotherapist Arthur Jackson, invoking the “flow” of Mihaly Czikszentmihalyi. They were lucky in already having good techniques – later players thought positive thinking could do the work for them. Chappell, however, was a class apart. He may even have imparted some of his drive to brother Ian, whose average after Greg joined him in the Test team was 12 runs higher than before.

He played his cover drive from full height. The bat came down straight. The weight surged through the ball. It looked imperious. It imperious. He never hurried, never seemed to push too hard, never thrashed or slogged when a stroke would do – he just made up his own rules and followed them, without deviation

There was something slightly forbidding about this. In contrast to Ian, a natural leader of men, Greg confessed himself only a “workmanlike” captain. Even to team-mates he could look stern, schoolmasterly. Geoff Lawson has described the agonies of entering the Australia team in 1980, of Chappell with hands on hips at slip “as if to say, ‘Don’t bowl that crap, son,’ every time I bowled a half-volley or got hit for a boundary”: he deemed Chappell “one of the poorest captains that I had ever played under”. His confreres Dennis Lillee and Rod Marsh found Chappell a more communicative and empathic captain after he had tasted ruinous failure in the summer of 1981-82. The struggles of others became more explicable in terms of his own.Chappell’s great indiscretion was the underarm delivery. Most cricket conflicts arise from adrenaline, anger, petulance. Here was a rare counter-example, originating in the opposite state of mind, from a coldly rational assessment of problem and of probabilities, involving a solution on Chappell’s mind since a one-day match during World Series Cricket had been won off the last ball by a tailender’s six. Chappell’s decision is generally construed as a momentary lapse, an instance of judgement impaired by tiredness. Yet it might also be seen as one of Chappell’s truest actions – evidence of his analytical mind and unsentimental nature. Producers in Channel 9’s commentary position used to direct cameramen to vision of Chappell with a terse instruction: “Give us a shot of Killer.” Killers are as killers do.Chappell’s self-mastery might have come harder than it appears. He retired twice in his career, once publicly in 1977, once privately in 1982, when his form was at its worst. He also developed considerable business interests, as though he aspired to leaving cricket behind. When they did not really fructify, he remained in the game with a seeming ambivalence. Few men know batting better, but his coaching record is indifferent. He commentates knowledgeably but without much enthusiasm. He quit noisily as an Australian selector in the 1980s, and has returned more than 20 years later, this time in the created role of national talent manager. He is not the only cricketer, of course, to have struggled to find a place in life that suited him as amply as the crease. Nor in art is it rare for beauty to arise from hidden struggle.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus